Thursday 5 March 2015

Written Task: ill Manors and Collective Identity

In your opinion, how does the representation of youth in 'iLL Manors' affect the collective identity of British youth?

Personally, I believe the representation of youth in 'iLL Manors" is approached with much more empathy compared to the way youth is depicted within other realms of the media. This is due to the film's director, Ben Drew, who had close ties and personal experience with the environment in which he depicts in his directorial debut. Drew commented, "I think the reason why we didn't have respect for authority was that we felt that we were ignored by society, that we didn't belong to it." This is a factor that Drew attempted to highlight and used as an explanation as to why youth become involved in crimes and violence in 'iLL Manors'. One way he achieves this is through the music he created, which accompanied certain characters' story arcs and offers the audience insight into how the characters became involved in their respective situations. In addition, integral plot points showed the characters to have some semblance of a moral compass and sense of community. For example, throughout the film the character of Ed is portrayed as a drug-dealing and violent criminal, but ultimately he commits a heroic act by saving a baby from a burning house - an act he sacrifices his life for. An audience who watched this could have shifted their views on the collective identity of British youth as it portrays them youth to be caring and fundamentally moral. Playwright Bola Agbaje supported this aspect of the film, "These people are not heartless or uncaring; underneath the violence, the film showed they have a softer side." On the other hand, 'iLL Manors' arguably reinforces many of the audience's views of the collective identity of British youth, as Drew does little to subvert stereotypes or expectations. For instance, one shot depicted two teenage girls in their school uniform, although their skirts were short, they were wearing hoop earrings and made frequent use of expletives. An audience would most likely have this pre-conceived idea of youth as rebelling against authority, and the film did little to disperse those stereotypes. Former MP and novelist Edwina Currie identified that every character had the opportunity to turn their back on trouble and make the ethical choice, using the character Jake as an example, "But at the same time he could have made a different choice, the choice to walk away." This interpretation could indicate that certain audience members thought that the choices that the youths made were solely their own, and ultimately they had the choice to pick the moral path. Therefore, the collective identity of British youth in this instance could not have been dramatically changed, as the audience may have experienced a lack of sympathy for the choices the characters made, and believe that youth are responsible for their own actions - this makes the violent and criminal acts they commit inexcusable.

1 comment:

  1. You write clearly and cogently and make some good points Evie. I think that the fact that Drew, through the persona of Plan B, uses his music and lyrics to challenge the dominant view of society towards poorer elements within it is interesting as his style of music (rap/urban) is unlikely to appeal to those he wishes to get the message!

    This is a challenge he faces generally in positioning the audience to think about the failings of society. It is possible to argue that those who need to se this film the most are most unlikely to see it. Indeed, their perceptions of the film are more likely to be skewed by the interpretations of the film given by the reviews of others (two Step Flow.)

    The challenge for you Evie will be to distill your thoughts and analysis regarding collective identity down into the most salient and relevant points which are supported by carefully selected reference to source material and the opinions of others.

    ReplyDelete